Tuesday, September 16, 2014


I do like when celebrities do great inspiring things such as donate lots of money or adopt poor starving children and occasionally reading about that in a magazine. However, I can't stand when that same celebrity, or any other celebrity for that matter, has their photo plastered on a magazine cover which is airbrushed and edited to the limit with facts or questions about them that aren't remotely important or at the least entertaining. Then, the insides of some of these magazines have private photos of the same people taken by hidden paparazzi while the celebrities are out walking their dog or spending the day with their children unexpectedly and without their consent. Any page that doesn’t contain a fake or personal photo with some odd lame facts about the celebrities is strewed with ads. Ads are one of the main reasons I don’t read magazines as I like to skip ads like I do with television, but there no channels to change, but rather pages to turn though I tend to not enjoy what’s on that next page.

The problem is that they are the main magazines in the checkout lines. Sure, you’ll see a stray educational or productive magazine such as National Geographic or Better Homes and Gardens, but the gist are focused on celebrities and athletes. Those magazines give false beliefs to people from the cover alone, that everyone should look this way, perfect, and perfection does not exist, which is why a computer is used to make them look this way. Makes sense why they place it right next to the candy, because it is precisely that, candy, eye candy, and you are forced to see them due to the fact that they are near the exit. Yet, all you have to do is see them and skim over the pages unlike mouth candy therefore there is no reason to buy them.

At this rate, technology will be so advanced that they won’t even need to, and probably WON’T, use the actual people in magazine photos but rather CGI effects, just like robots in movies, which is the direction we seem to be heading any ways.